View Full Version : can i get a fisheye lens for my new digital camera ?
HailToTheThief
06-27-2004, 02:18 PM
lets say i am going to purchase a Sony DSC-W1 http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=kRxHhROTwFhHh1NNRfNNjlydcwwb5DUdZ5c=?Cat egoryName=pr_p_newcyber_dcc&Dept=dcc&TemplateName= item%2fsy_item_a&ProductSKU=DSCW1
would i be able to get ANY kind of fisheye lens for it ?
my price range is up to $150 on the lens
i dont care if it fits, if there is a way to make it work
im not above using duct tape, either
any help/suggestions are much appreciated
Skate or Try
06-27-2004, 05:43 PM
i'm gonna say no, and if you want to use a fisheye a lot get a different camera for that price or get a decent SLR...film all the way
Skate or Try
06-27-2004, 05:45 PM
after reading it 'Conversion Lens Compatible
With the optional VAD-WA adaptor, you can add tele- or wide- conversion lenses for greater magnification or wider field of view, as well as protective and special effect filters.' maybe
Snaker
06-27-2004, 05:53 PM
No, you can't. Just take long-lense shots.
Skate or Try
06-27-2004, 07:17 PM
No buy film....FILM
HailToTheThief
06-27-2004, 07:30 PM
i certainly would
but digital will have to suffice until i can afford film
thanks for the help, though
Skate or Try
06-28-2004, 05:28 PM
You can get film with that money, most cameras now sync at 1/250th which will do for skating
sugar muppet
06-28-2004, 06:33 PM
or if you really want a camera that you can get a fisheye for, buy a cheap manual SLR off ebay, say $60, then get a zenitar fisheye for $75 maybe?
there ya go, along with shipping and stuff, that will be around $160.
and the money you save from not buying the camera ($400) can go towards a flash (or 2), a 50mm lens (a standard lens) and some other bits and pieces, plus film and developing.
Skate or Try
06-28-2004, 07:36 PM
yeah thats want I said duh. Make sure the SLR syncs at 1/250th or over, or you'll be buying a new one within a month.
sugar muppet
06-29-2004, 12:09 AM
no, you had the idea, i explained it.
:D
BakerStencil
06-29-2004, 02:45 AM
Read the new Transworld theres a Vs. on Digital vs. Film...Film kicks Digitals butt.
sk8er6792
06-29-2004, 03:03 AM
I got a really old cannon( probally from 1995) and I have no idea how it works. We got it from my great uncle joe. Its film so whoo hoo!
Skate or Try
06-29-2004, 07:14 PM
great uncle joe is the man
sugar muppet
06-29-2004, 10:37 PM
your mum's a man James...
i was playing around with the D70 today... mighty fine piece of equipment... too light if you ask me though. I dunno, DSLR's are cool, but the conversion factor is ghey. eh... the D1x i'm getting is free, so who am i to complain?
although i'm getting the shittiest lenses ever, haha.
snakeyes17
06-30-2004, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by BakerStencil
Read the new Transworld theres a Vs. on Digital vs. Film...Film kicks Digitals butt.
Yeah film is a lot better.(I read the article today)But film costs money...they said if seu trinh would have used film it would cost him $25000 i think.
Skate or Try
06-30-2004, 07:01 PM
Originally posted by sugar muppet
your mum's a man James...
i was playing around with the D70 today... mighty fine piece of equipment... too light if you ask me though. I dunno, DSLR's are cool, but the conversion factor is ghey. eh... the D1x i'm getting is free, so who am i to complain?
although i'm getting the shittiest lenses ever, haha.
too light? So...get the additional brick add on.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.